Who to Call for Abandoned Baby Birds Connecticut
(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their start or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of five unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-xix Vaccine Prophylactic in Significant Persons." But as agonizing equally the data is the fact that the study authors plain sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth most vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention past a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yep, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their showtime or 2nd trimesters.
- Aye, the report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating significant women is perfectly prophylactic. But the report data really show quite the oppose.
Here'due south how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Tabular array 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their beginning or second trimesters. (Yous have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their starting time or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the tertiary trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their 3rd trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should take used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another manner, it is impossible for a adult female who was vaccinated for the first time during her tertiary trimester to have a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the showtime 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make information technology appear that vaccines are rubber for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It's a minor set of 127 meaning women, so nosotros'd like to encounter a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in club to get a more clear picture.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of l lemons and l limes, with a science written report request the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and attain the number 50. They mistakenly split up fifty into 100 because in that location are 100 total piece of fruit, and so they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" considering it'due south 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly exist included because they're limes, non lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the right answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were simply vaccinated in the tertiary trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't get dorsum in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — so "science" has already failed its core promise: to offering "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world around united states of america.
Yet when iv out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Considering they're roofing up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most probable.
In fact, the key author of the report, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same error in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant adventure of adverse events? For instance, here's another report he co-authored: "Adverse events later on Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That written report concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify whatsoever new or unexpected rubber concerns later on TIV-ID."
Merely is that determination based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Maybe this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't exist the start time one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. Nosotros tin't just accept bad math and phone call information technology "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.
Spike poly peptide injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, it'south clear that four out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the starting time 20 weeks (at least, according to the modest data ready we take so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins direct attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human being cells, information technology should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this every bit a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." Yous tin hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that live births may plummet by three.two million over the next yr, in the Us alone, if every meaning woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies existence murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'due south state management czar once characterized human children as an "environmental run a risk."
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And information technology goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." Information technology is a spiritual betrayal of the entire man race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated past a desire to aid humanity, simply are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity's devastation.
Larn more in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Who to Call for Abandoned Baby Birds Connecticut"
Post a Comment